TY - GEN
T1 - Which elements should be recycled for a comprehensive fuel cycle?
AU - Piet, Steven
AU - Bjornard, Trond
AU - Dixon, Brent
AU - Gombert, Dirk
AU - Laws, Chris
AU - Matthern, Gretchen
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Uranium recovery can reduce the mass of waste and possibly the number of waste packages that require geologic disposal. Separated uranium can be managed with the same method (near-surface burial) as used for the larger quantities of depleted uranium or recycled into new fuel. Recycle of all transuranics reduces long-term environmental burden, reduces heat load to repositories, extracts more energy from the original uranium ore, and may have significant proliferation resistance and physical security advantages. Recovery of short-lived fission products cesium and strontium can allow them to decay to low-level waste in facilities tailored to that need, rather than geologic disposal. This could also reduce the number and cost of waste packages requiring geologic disposal. These savings are offset by costs for separation, recycle, and storage systems. Recovery of technetium-99 and iodine-129 can allow them to be sent to geologic disposal in improved waste forms. Such separation avoids contamination of the other products (uranium) and waste (cesium-strontium) streams with long-lived radioisotopes so the material might be disposed as low-level waste. Transmutation of technetium and iodine is a possible future alternative.
AB - Uranium recovery can reduce the mass of waste and possibly the number of waste packages that require geologic disposal. Separated uranium can be managed with the same method (near-surface burial) as used for the larger quantities of depleted uranium or recycled into new fuel. Recycle of all transuranics reduces long-term environmental burden, reduces heat load to repositories, extracts more energy from the original uranium ore, and may have significant proliferation resistance and physical security advantages. Recovery of short-lived fission products cesium and strontium can allow them to decay to low-level waste in facilities tailored to that need, rather than geologic disposal. This could also reduce the number and cost of waste packages requiring geologic disposal. These savings are offset by costs for separation, recycle, and storage systems. Recovery of technetium-99 and iodine-129 can allow them to be sent to geologic disposal in improved waste forms. Such separation avoids contamination of the other products (uranium) and waste (cesium-strontium) streams with long-lived radioisotopes so the material might be disposed as low-level waste. Transmutation of technetium and iodine is a possible future alternative.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/45149095884
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:45149095884
SN - 0894480553
SN - 9780894480553
T3 - GLOBAL 2007: Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Systems
SP - 1595
EP - 1603
BT - GLOBAL 2007
T2 - GLOBAL 2007: Advanced Nuclear Fuel Cycles and Systems
Y2 - 9 September 2007 through 13 September 2007
ER -