TY - JOUR
T1 - Voltammetry measurements in lithium chloride-lithium oxide (LiCl–Li2O) salt
T2 - An evaluation of working electrode materials
AU - Williams, Ammon N.
AU - Cao, Guoping
AU - Shaltry, Michael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - Instrumentation to provide process monitoring (PM) and safeguards for the oxide reduction (OR) step in the electrochemical processing of used oxide nuclear fuel is necessary to ensure equipment is operated as declared. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) has been proposed for real-time monitoring of the operation of an OR process for safeguards purposes. In this study, 316L stainless steel (SS), tantalum (Ta), molybdenum (Mo), tungsten (W), platinum (Pt), and iridium (Ir) were evaluated as potential working electrode (WE) materials based on their chemical inertness, corrosion resistance, and sensitivity in detecting lithium oxide (Li2O) and other chloride salts in the OR electrolyte. Of the electrodes evaluated, 316L SS, Ir, and Pt all performed reasonably well in the lithium chloride-lithium oxide (LiCl-Li2O) electrolyte. SS was operated in the cathodic potential, had reasonable corrosion resistance, and is relatively inexpensive. Ir could be operated in both the cathodic and anodic potentials and was the most corrosion-resistant of the materials evaluated. Pt is limited to the anodic potential range, had reasonable corrosion resistance, and was the most sensitive to Li2O concentrations in the salt. In the development of a stand-alone safeguards instrumentation, our recommendation is a CV probe fitted with both Ir and Pt WEs. The results of this study may also be helpful for anode material selection in other electrometallurgy industries, such as molten salt electrolysis.
AB - Instrumentation to provide process monitoring (PM) and safeguards for the oxide reduction (OR) step in the electrochemical processing of used oxide nuclear fuel is necessary to ensure equipment is operated as declared. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) has been proposed for real-time monitoring of the operation of an OR process for safeguards purposes. In this study, 316L stainless steel (SS), tantalum (Ta), molybdenum (Mo), tungsten (W), platinum (Pt), and iridium (Ir) were evaluated as potential working electrode (WE) materials based on their chemical inertness, corrosion resistance, and sensitivity in detecting lithium oxide (Li2O) and other chloride salts in the OR electrolyte. Of the electrodes evaluated, 316L SS, Ir, and Pt all performed reasonably well in the lithium chloride-lithium oxide (LiCl-Li2O) electrolyte. SS was operated in the cathodic potential, had reasonable corrosion resistance, and is relatively inexpensive. Ir could be operated in both the cathodic and anodic potentials and was the most corrosion-resistant of the materials evaluated. Pt is limited to the anodic potential range, had reasonable corrosion resistance, and was the most sensitive to Li2O concentrations in the salt. In the development of a stand-alone safeguards instrumentation, our recommendation is a CV probe fitted with both Ir and Pt WEs. The results of this study may also be helpful for anode material selection in other electrometallurgy industries, such as molten salt electrolysis.
KW - Molten salt
KW - Oxide reduction
KW - Process monitoring
KW - Pyroprocessing
KW - Safeguards
KW - Voltammetry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098978990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152760
DO - 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152760
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098978990
SN - 0022-3115
VL - 546
JO - Journal of Nuclear Materials
JF - Journal of Nuclear Materials
M1 - 152760
ER -