@inproceedings{f07db4fe01b543a3935608324e3d3cc4,
title = "Thermal and mechanical energy performance analysis of closed-loop systems in hot-dry-rock and hot-wet-rock reservoirs",
abstract = "To understand the potential and limitations for recovering thermal and mechanical energy from closed-loop geothermal systems a collaborative study is underway that will investigate an array of system configurations, working fluids, geothermal reservoir characteristics, operational periods, and heat transfer enhancements. Closed-loop geothermal systems are distinguished from hydrothermal or enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) in that the working fluid only circulates through drilled boreholes. Principal objectives of this study are to determine upper limits for thermal and mechanical energy recovery and optimal operational and configuration parameters for each scenario. Teams of scientists and engineers are applying a suite of numerical simulation and analytical tools to model the heat recovery from closed-loop geothermal systems, and then optimizing operational and configuration parameters to maximize the thermal and mechanical energy recovery. Results from the suite of numerical simulators and analytical tools, such as outlet and inlet states and temperature profiles in the geothermal reservoir over time are intercompared to increase confidence in the analysis. This paper documents the study findings for closed-loop systems in hot-dry-rock and hot-wet-rock reservoirs, where water is the working fluid. The characteristics of the hot-dry-rock reservoir were based on the U.S. Department of Energy's Utah Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy (FORGE) site, near Milford Utah. Two objective functions are defined to optimize the operational and configuration parameters of the system, one each for the recovery of mechanical and thermal energy over the period of operation. For both objective functions, a surface plant thermal to mechanical energy conversion factor and an energy drilling cost is required. In keeping with the study objectives the surface plant conversion factor is determined from a second-law of thermodynamics analysis of a generic binary plant, and drilling costs are based on those from the Utah FORGE site and current national electrical costs.",
keywords = "Closed-loop geothermal systems, Coaxial borehole, Collaborative study, Hot-dry-rock, Hot-wet-rock, Numerical simulation, U-shaped borehole",
author = "\{Closed Loop Geothermal Working Group\} and Mark White and Mario Martinez and Yaroslav Vasyliv and Bran-Anleu, \{Gabriela A.\} and Carlo Parisi and Paolo Balestra and Roland Horne and Chad Augstine and Laura Pauley and Doug Hollett and Giorgia Bettin and Theron Marshall and D. Andrs and C. Augustine and S. Baek and P. Balestra and G. Bettin and D. Blankenship and L. Boyd and \{Bran Anleu\}, G. and E. Brown and Z. Frone and D. Hollett and Horne, \{R. N.\} and A. Kucala and C. Lam and Lechman, \{J. B.\} and Lowry, \{T. S.\} and Marshall, \{T. D.\} and M. Martinez and Pauley, \{L. L.\} and C. Parisi and S. Porse and C. Proctor and Subia, \{S. R.\} and White, \{M. D.\} and J. Winick and Yasyliv, \{Y. V.\}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021 Geothermal Rising.; 2021 Geothermal Rising Conference: Using the Earth to Save the Earth, GRC 2021 ; Conference date: 03-10-2021 Through 06-10-2021",
year = "2021",
language = "English",
series = "Transactions - Geothermal Resources Council",
publisher = "Geothermal Resources Council",
pages = "132--150",
booktitle = "Using the Earth to Save the Earth - 2021 Geothermal Rising Conference, GRC 2021",
}