Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The efficiency of reading around learned backgrounds

  • Miguel P. Eckstein
  • , Binh T. Pham
  • , Craig K. Abbey
  • , Yani Zhang

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Most metrics of medical image quality typically treat all variability components of the background as a Gaussian noise process. This includes task based model observers (non-prewhitening matched filter without and with an eye filter, NPW and NPWE; Hotelling and Channelized Hotelling) as well as Fourier metrics of medical image quality based on the noise power spectra. However, many investigators have observed that unlike many of the models/metrics, physicians often can discount signal-looking structures that are part of the normal anatomic background. This process has been referred to as reading around the background or noise. The purpose of this paper is to develop an experimental framework to systematically study the ability of human observers to read around learned backgrounds and compare their ability to that of an optimal ideal observer which has knowledge of the background. We measured human localization performance of one of twelve targets in the presence of a fixed background consisting of randomly placed Gaussians with random contrasts and sizes, and white noise. Performance was compared to a condition in which the test images contained only white noise but with higher contrast. Human performance was compared to standard model observers that treat the background as a Gaussian noise process (NPW, NPWE and Hotelling), a Fourier-based prewhitening matched filter, and an ideal observer. The Hotelling, NPW, NPWE models as well as the Fourier-based prewhitening matched filter predicted higher performance for the white noise test images than the background plus white noise. In contrast, ideal and human performance was higher for the background plus white noise condition. Furthermore, human performance exceeded that of the NPW, NPWE and Hotelling models and reached an efficiency of 19% relative to the ideal observer. Our results demonstrate that for some types of images human signal localization performance is consistent with use of knowledge about the high order moments of the backgrounds to discount signal-looking structures that belong to the background. In such scenarios model observers and metrics that either ignore the background or treat the background as a Gaussian process (Hotelling, Channelized Hotelling, Task-based SNR) under predict human performance.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMedical Imaging 2006
Subtitle of host publicationImage Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes
EventMedical Imaging 2006: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: Feb 14 2006Feb 16 2006

Publication series

NameProgress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE
Volume6146
ISSN (Print)1605-7422

Conference

ConferenceMedical Imaging 2006: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period02/14/0602/16/06

Keywords

  • Anatomical noise
  • Human observer performance
  • Ideal observer
  • Metrics of image quality
  • Model observers
  • Signal to noise ratio
  • Structured backgrounds

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The efficiency of reading around learned backgrounds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this