Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Technoeconomic analysis of five microalgae-to-biofuels processes of varying complexity

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

182 Scopus citations

Abstract

The economics surrounding five algae-to-fuels process scenarios were examined. The different processes modeled were as follows: an open pond producing either triacylglycerides (TAG) or free fatty acid methyl ester (FAME), a solar-lit photobioreactor producing either FAME or free fatty acids (FFA), and a light emitting diode irradiated (LED-lighted) photobioreactor producing TAG. These processes were chosen to represent both classical and esoteric approaches presented in the open literature. Viable (or suggested) processing techniques to liberate and purify (and convert) the microalgal triacylglycerides were then modeled to accompany each growth option. The investment and cost per kg of fuel or fuel precursor for each process was determined. The open pond produced TAG at ~$7.50/kg, while the process using the LED-lit photobioreactor produced TAG at ~$33/kg. The scenario containing the solar-lit photobioreactor produced FAME at ~$25/kg, while the open pond produced FAME at ~$4/kg. The scenario containing the solar-lit photobioreactor produced FFA at ~$29/kg. The open pond scenarios appear to be closest to the $1/kg pricepoint at this time, and thus are the most viable economic options. Future technological advancements that reduce the cost of bioreactor vessels, LED lighting, and solvent recovery, may reduce the oil production costs of these scenarios to a more attractive level.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9350-9359
Number of pages10
JournalBioresource Technology
Volume102
Issue number20
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011

Keywords

  • Biofuel
  • Economics
  • Microalgae
  • Open pond
  • Photobioreactor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Technoeconomic analysis of five microalgae-to-biofuels processes of varying complexity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this