TY - GEN
T1 - Techno-economic analysis of conventional, high moisture pelletization and briquetting process
AU - Tumuluru, Jaya Shankar
AU - Kenney, Kevin L.
AU - Cafferty, Kara
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Developing uniformly formatted, densified feedstock from both forest and agricultural based biomass is of interest to decrease feedstock cost and increase quality through influencing storage, transportation, and handling characteristics. Raw biomass, by nature, is highly variable. Densification eliminates variability by achieving consistent size, shape, bulk and unit density, and durability. A variety of densification systems such as (1) pellet mill, (2) cuber, (3) screw extruder, (4) briquette press, (5) roller press, (6) tablet press, and (7) agglomerator can be used for producing a uniform format feedstock commodity for bioenergy applications. Densified biomass products are widely used as commodity-type products for energy applications and are traded both nationally and internationally. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the techno-economic feasibility of conventional pelleting, high-moisture pelleting and briquetting process. The analysis includes energy consumption and capital, and operational costs for the three processes identified to produce 800, 000 tons of densified corn stover for bioenergy applications. Analysis of conventional pelletization processes indicates drying fuel costs of about 10.70 $/ton to be a substantial financial barrier compared with pellet milling and secondary grinding at 4.9-5.1 $/ton in fuel cost. High-moisture pelletization offers a solution to high drying costs as it could reduce about (10 $/ton) in the total pelletization cost. In this study, high-moisture densification drying costs were estimated to be significantly less by about 9.6 $/ton, due to use of energy efficient dryers like cross flow grain dryers. The total cost to produce 800, 000 tons of pellets/year is about $32.2 million (about 20% lower compared to conventional pelletization process). In contrast, conventional briquetting maintains the high drying cost ($10.70/ton) but reduces the secondary grinder cost ($7.88/ton). This reduction is caused by the briquetting process capability to use bigger particles sizes. The total cost to produce 800, 000 briquettes per year is about $39.3 million.
AB - Developing uniformly formatted, densified feedstock from both forest and agricultural based biomass is of interest to decrease feedstock cost and increase quality through influencing storage, transportation, and handling characteristics. Raw biomass, by nature, is highly variable. Densification eliminates variability by achieving consistent size, shape, bulk and unit density, and durability. A variety of densification systems such as (1) pellet mill, (2) cuber, (3) screw extruder, (4) briquette press, (5) roller press, (6) tablet press, and (7) agglomerator can be used for producing a uniform format feedstock commodity for bioenergy applications. Densified biomass products are widely used as commodity-type products for energy applications and are traded both nationally and internationally. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the techno-economic feasibility of conventional pelleting, high-moisture pelleting and briquetting process. The analysis includes energy consumption and capital, and operational costs for the three processes identified to produce 800, 000 tons of densified corn stover for bioenergy applications. Analysis of conventional pelletization processes indicates drying fuel costs of about 10.70 $/ton to be a substantial financial barrier compared with pellet milling and secondary grinding at 4.9-5.1 $/ton in fuel cost. High-moisture pelletization offers a solution to high drying costs as it could reduce about (10 $/ton) in the total pelletization cost. In this study, high-moisture densification drying costs were estimated to be significantly less by about 9.6 $/ton, due to use of energy efficient dryers like cross flow grain dryers. The total cost to produce 800, 000 tons of pellets/year is about $32.2 million (about 20% lower compared to conventional pelletization process). In contrast, conventional briquetting maintains the high drying cost ($10.70/ton) but reduces the secondary grinder cost ($7.88/ton). This reduction is caused by the briquetting process capability to use bigger particles sizes. The total cost to produce 800, 000 briquettes per year is about $39.3 million.
KW - Biomass
KW - Briquetting
KW - Densification
KW - Pelleting
KW - Techno-economic analysis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84911497255
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84911497255
T3 - American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2014, ASABE 2014
SP - 4177
EP - 4189
BT - American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2014, ASABE 2014
PB - American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
T2 - American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting 2014, ASABE 2014
Y2 - 13 July 2014 through 16 July 2014
ER -