TY - GEN
T1 - Novel reactor designs to burn non-fissile fuels
AU - Gilleland, John
AU - Ahlfeld, Charles
AU - Dadiomov, Dimitri
AU - Hyde, Rod
AU - Ishikawa, Yuki
AU - McAlees, David
AU - McWhirter, Jon
AU - Myhrvold, Nathan
AU - Nuckolls, John
AU - Odedra, Ashok
AU - Weaver, Kevan
AU - Whitmer, Charles
AU - Wood, Lowell
AU - Zimmerman, George
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Intellectual Ventures is leading a private initiative to explore new approaches to nuclear power We have used advanced computational tools and modeling technology to reexamine some of the fundamental assumptions-such as the requirement for a continuous supply of enriched fuel-that have long driven the design of fission reactor cores. Our highest goal is to simplfy nuclear infrastructure in multiple ways that will help fission power meet the world:c growing need for affordable and sustainable energy by directly addressing the issues of emissions, proljferation resistance, safely, and long- term fuel disposal. Our concepts build on the ideas for a "traveling wave" reactor (TWR) first presented by Edward Teller et al. in the early 1990s.' Initial work suggested that traveling- wave reactor designs could offrr several important advantages over other fission reactor designs. After startup, for example, a TWR could run for its entire design ljfe without refueling with fissile material or alternatively, might allow for refueling without a pause in operation. A TWR plant would also require little or no enriched uranium after an initial "ignition" phase; instead it would burn natural uranium, depleted uranium (a low-cost byproduct of uranium enrichment), or possibly even thorium for most of its life. These advantages derive from the unique way in which a TWR burns its fuel. A nuclear deflagration wave is first formed using enriched uranium or some other fissile material. The slow-moving wave front is allowed to expand into adjacent sections of the core that contain only fertile material, where it breeds its own fuel and advances at a slow and self-limiting pace. The cost of energy delivered by LWRs has been increasing due to the rapidly rising cost of enriched uranium fuel. TWRs fueled primarily by natural uranium or depleted uranium (huge stockpiles of which exist) could, f widely deployed, extend the remaining economic resources of uranium from a centuiy to several millennia. TWRs that burn thorium fuel would tap into an essentially unlimited resource: by some estimates, thorium reserves would be sufficient with such reactors to support the global population at energy consumption levels equivalent to the current US per-capita rate/or tens of millennia. We have performed integrated physics and engineering analyses of several TWR reactor designs, including those fueled by natural uranium, depleted uranium, thorium, and combinations of these. The various reactor concepts address distinct markets and applications, and each raises interesting engineering challenges. This paper includes illustrations and numeric examples of our progress to date and highlights some of the questions still to be answered about this fundamentally new approach to nuclear energy.
AB - Intellectual Ventures is leading a private initiative to explore new approaches to nuclear power We have used advanced computational tools and modeling technology to reexamine some of the fundamental assumptions-such as the requirement for a continuous supply of enriched fuel-that have long driven the design of fission reactor cores. Our highest goal is to simplfy nuclear infrastructure in multiple ways that will help fission power meet the world:c growing need for affordable and sustainable energy by directly addressing the issues of emissions, proljferation resistance, safely, and long- term fuel disposal. Our concepts build on the ideas for a "traveling wave" reactor (TWR) first presented by Edward Teller et al. in the early 1990s.' Initial work suggested that traveling- wave reactor designs could offrr several important advantages over other fission reactor designs. After startup, for example, a TWR could run for its entire design ljfe without refueling with fissile material or alternatively, might allow for refueling without a pause in operation. A TWR plant would also require little or no enriched uranium after an initial "ignition" phase; instead it would burn natural uranium, depleted uranium (a low-cost byproduct of uranium enrichment), or possibly even thorium for most of its life. These advantages derive from the unique way in which a TWR burns its fuel. A nuclear deflagration wave is first formed using enriched uranium or some other fissile material. The slow-moving wave front is allowed to expand into adjacent sections of the core that contain only fertile material, where it breeds its own fuel and advances at a slow and self-limiting pace. The cost of energy delivered by LWRs has been increasing due to the rapidly rising cost of enriched uranium fuel. TWRs fueled primarily by natural uranium or depleted uranium (huge stockpiles of which exist) could, f widely deployed, extend the remaining economic resources of uranium from a centuiy to several millennia. TWRs that burn thorium fuel would tap into an essentially unlimited resource: by some estimates, thorium reserves would be sufficient with such reactors to support the global population at energy consumption levels equivalent to the current US per-capita rate/or tens of millennia. We have performed integrated physics and engineering analyses of several TWR reactor designs, including those fueled by natural uranium, depleted uranium, thorium, and combinations of these. The various reactor concepts address distinct markets and applications, and each raises interesting engineering challenges. This paper includes illustrations and numeric examples of our progress to date and highlights some of the questions still to be answered about this fundamentally new approach to nuclear energy.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/70349887624
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:70349887624
SN - 9781605607870
T3 - International Conference on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants, ICAPP 2008
SP - 2278
EP - 2284
BT - American Nuclear Society - International Conference on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants, ICAPP 2008
T2 - International Conference on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants, ICAPP 2008
Y2 - 8 June 2008 through 12 June 2008
ER -