TY - GEN
T1 - Multi-state top event prevention analysis
AU - Youngblood, R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© ESREL2020-PSAM15 Organizers.Published by Research Publishing, Singapore.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Choosing the set of systems, structures, and components (SSCs) for achieving the necessary performance to meet the safety objectives of a hazardous facility constitutes a type of “selection problem,” since all the selected elements must work together toward that goal. It is important that such objectives be accomplished as efficiently as possible. Top Event Prevention Analysis (TEPA) is a systematic tool for solving this selection problem by, in effect, deciding where to best allocate resources to ensure SSC performance. Inputs to TEPA include risk model cut sets, and its output is a list of prevention sets, each of which is a selection of elements whose joint reliability performance (achieved through prevention of failures) satisfies the safety objectives. In most existing applications of TEPA, basic events either do or do not fall within a given prevention set. The present paper, based on unpublished work by Youngblood et al., goes beyond that by illustrating TEPA’s ability to allocate performance in a m TEPA can be used to allocate intermediate levels of seismic capacity that efficiently satisfy safety objectives in ore nuanced way than an all-or-nothing approach. For example, with problems set up using multi-state logic rather than binary true/false logic,a practical manner.
AB - Choosing the set of systems, structures, and components (SSCs) for achieving the necessary performance to meet the safety objectives of a hazardous facility constitutes a type of “selection problem,” since all the selected elements must work together toward that goal. It is important that such objectives be accomplished as efficiently as possible. Top Event Prevention Analysis (TEPA) is a systematic tool for solving this selection problem by, in effect, deciding where to best allocate resources to ensure SSC performance. Inputs to TEPA include risk model cut sets, and its output is a list of prevention sets, each of which is a selection of elements whose joint reliability performance (achieved through prevention of failures) satisfies the safety objectives. In most existing applications of TEPA, basic events either do or do not fall within a given prevention set. The present paper, based on unpublished work by Youngblood et al., goes beyond that by illustrating TEPA’s ability to allocate performance in a m TEPA can be used to allocate intermediate levels of seismic capacity that efficiently satisfy safety objectives in ore nuanced way than an all-or-nothing approach. For example, with problems set up using multi-state logic rather than binary true/false logic,a practical manner.
KW - Operator action
KW - Prevention analysis
KW - Seismic PRA
KW - TEPA
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85107276303
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/23648599-e4dc-3d7c-b266-2698516f41a6/
U2 - 10.3850/978-981-14-8593-0_4071-cd
DO - 10.3850/978-981-14-8593-0_4071-cd
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85110350308
T3 - Proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and the 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference
SP - 3255
EP - 3261
BT - Proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and the 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference
A2 - Baraldi, Piero
A2 - Di Maio, Francesco
A2 - Zio, Enrico
PB - Research Publishing, Singapore
T2 - 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2020 and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference, PSAM15 2020
Y2 - 1 November 2020 through 5 November 2020
ER -