Abstract
After the Fukushima accident, the application of passive safety features (PSF) has been importantly suggested for mitigating severe accidents in addition to the conventional active safety features. Nowadays, substantial number of studies related to passive system have been performed and each system has different impact on a nuclear power plant (NPP). For this reason, it is important to use appropriate passive features based on their impacts. Mitigation coverage of PSFs can be importantly used to estimate impact of PSFs. It can be estimated based on the number of accident scenarios, which can be mitigated by applying additional PSFs. In this study, the accident scenarios, which can cause core damage, are firstly defined using fault tree (FT) analysis. Multilevel flow modelling (MFM) is also used to verify completeness of FT. In this study, MFM model is also used to define additional PSFs, which need to mitigate accidents and to determine the number of scenarios that can be mitigated by applying each PSF. As a result, we estimate mitigation coverage of each passive feature as follow: (1) 62.2% of passive secondary cooling system (2) 42.2% of passive high-pressure injection system, (3) 14.6% of passive condenser cooling system.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| State | Published - 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
| Event | 14th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 2018 - Los Angeles, United States Duration: Sep 16 2018 → Sep 21 2018 |
Conference
| Conference | 14th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 2018 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Los Angeles |
| Period | 09/16/18 → 09/21/18 |
Keywords
- Hybrid SIT
- Mitigation coverage
- Multilevel flow model
- Passive system
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Mitigation coverage evaluation of passive systems based on causality estimation using multi-level flow model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver