TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanistic verification of empirical UO2 fuel fracture models
AU - Gamble, K. A.
AU - Knight, T. W.
AU - Roberts, E.
AU - Hales, J. D.
AU - Spencer, B. W.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research also made use of the resources of the High Performance Computing Center at Idaho National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Nuclear Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy and the Nuclear Science User Facilities under Contract No. DE-AC07-05ID14517.
Funding Information:
This work was funded by the US Department of Energy. The submitted manuscript has been authored by a contractor of the U.S. Government under Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517. Accordingly, the U.S. Government retains a non-exclusive, royalty free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. The primary author also thanks the Employee Education Program (EEP) at the Idaho National Laboratory for providing the opportunity to pursue further education through the University of South Carolina. This research also made use of the resources of the High Performance Computing Center at Idaho National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Nuclear Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy and the Nuclear Science User Facilities under Contract No. DE-AC07-05ID14517.
Funding Information:
This work was funded by the US Department of Energy. The submitted manuscript has been authored by a contractor of the U.S. Government under Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517. Accordingly, the U.S. Government retains a non-exclusive, royalty free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes. The primary author also thanks the Employee Education Program (EEP) at the Idaho National Laboratory for providing the opportunity to pursue further education through the University of South Carolina.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - Standard UO2 fuel pellets used in light-water reactors fracture during irradiation due to the large thermal gradient in the radial direction. Over the decades, numerous researchers have explored fuel cracking from experimental and modeling points of view. To date, there have been both empirical and mechanistic approaches to predict the number of fragments that form in UO2. The empirical models only consider maximum power and burnup as inputs. Existing mechanistic approaches for normal operation have not accounted for irradiation effects. This work employs a mechanistic fuel cracking model using the extended finite element method to explore radial crack formation while including a sensitivity analysis that accounts for the randomization of tensile strength within the fuel, the strength randomization criteria (uniform or volume-weighted Weibull), power ramping rates, computational mesh density, maximum power level, and irradiation (burnup) effects. The results indicate that the uncertainty in this mechanistic modeling approach envelopes the predicted values from three different empirical correlations in almost all cases. This means that, for computationally intensive analyses involving UO2 fragmentation, the empirical correlations can be used. However, since the mechanistic calculations bound those of the empirical correlations, there is confidence in the applicability of the mechanistic approach developed in this work to generate a correlation for fuel types where limited data exists (e.g., doped-UO2, U3Si2).
AB - Standard UO2 fuel pellets used in light-water reactors fracture during irradiation due to the large thermal gradient in the radial direction. Over the decades, numerous researchers have explored fuel cracking from experimental and modeling points of view. To date, there have been both empirical and mechanistic approaches to predict the number of fragments that form in UO2. The empirical models only consider maximum power and burnup as inputs. Existing mechanistic approaches for normal operation have not accounted for irradiation effects. This work employs a mechanistic fuel cracking model using the extended finite element method to explore radial crack formation while including a sensitivity analysis that accounts for the randomization of tensile strength within the fuel, the strength randomization criteria (uniform or volume-weighted Weibull), power ramping rates, computational mesh density, maximum power level, and irradiation (burnup) effects. The results indicate that the uncertainty in this mechanistic modeling approach envelopes the predicted values from three different empirical correlations in almost all cases. This means that, for computationally intensive analyses involving UO2 fragmentation, the empirical correlations can be used. However, since the mechanistic calculations bound those of the empirical correlations, there is confidence in the applicability of the mechanistic approach developed in this work to generate a correlation for fuel types where limited data exists (e.g., doped-UO2, U3Si2).
KW - BISON
KW - Fuel Fracture
KW - Uncertainty Quantification
KW - XFEM
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85110456062
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/aef2c2e0-2b67-34c9-ae05-c7962b2e9b1e/
U2 - 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153163
DO - 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153163
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85110456062
SN - 0022-3115
VL - 556
JO - Journal of Nuclear Materials
JF - Journal of Nuclear Materials
M1 - 153163
ER -