TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanistic understanding of support effect on the activity and selectivity of indium oxide catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation
AU - Regalado Vera, Clarita Y.
AU - Manavi, Narges
AU - Zhou, Zheng
AU - Wang, Lu Cun
AU - Diao, Weijian
AU - Karakalos, Stavros
AU - Liu, Bin
AU - Stowers, Kara J.
AU - Zhou, Meng
AU - Luo, Hongmei
AU - Ding, Dong
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Idaho National Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program under DOE Idaho Operations Office under contract no. DE-AC07-05ID14517. N. M. and B. L. are thankful for the Sustainable Energy Award provided by Center of Sustainability Energy at Kansas State University and acknowledge the supercomputing service provided by K-State Beocat Research Cluster funded in part by NSF grants CHE-1726332 , CNS-1006860 , EPS-1006860 , and EPS-0919443 ; and the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) under the contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 . W. D and H. L would like to thank a subcontract from Idaho National Laboratory.
Funding Information:
This work was supported by Idaho National Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program under DOE Idaho Operations Office under contract no. DE-AC07-05ID14517. N. M. and B. L. are thankful for the Sustainable Energy Award provided by Center of Sustainability Energy at Kansas State University and acknowledge the supercomputing service provided by K-State Beocat Research Cluster funded in part by NSF grants CHE-1726332, CNS-1006860, EPS-1006860, and EPS-0919443; and the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) under the contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. W. D and H. L would like to thank a subcontract from Idaho National Laboratory.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/12/15
Y1 - 2021/12/15
N2 - Herein we present a mechanistic study on the support effect (ZrO2 and CeO2) of In2O3 catalysts in CO2 hydrogenation by a combined experimental and computational approach. Kinetic experiments and surface characterization suggested that the activity of In2O3 catalysts cannot be simply correlated with the abundance of surface oxygen vacancies (Ov) formed by either H2-reduction or thermal treatment, which has been frequently invoked in previous studies. The support effect should originate from the electronic interactions between In2O3 and the support oxide, rather than geometric factors or the difference in the particle size of In2O3. Theoretical modelling revealed that surface Ov facilitate the formation and stabilization of the formate (HCOO*) intermediate. While a carbonate-like structure is favored for CO2 adsorption on CeO2-supported or unsupported In2O3 catalysts, CO2 tends to bind strongly in a bent configuration on the Ov site at the In2O3-ZrO2 interface. The distinct CO2 adsorption structures on different supported In2O3 catalysts may account for the different reaction energy profiles in the subsequent hydrogenation reactions, especially the rate-limiting step, i.e., hydrogenation of HCOO* to CH2O* and methoxy (CH3O*). The relatively higher methanol selectivity of In2O3 catalyst supported on ZrO2 with respect to that on CeO2 is suggested to stem from the greater energy difference (ΔEa) between the parallel hydrogenation and C-O bond cleavage of HCOO*, which leads to the formation of methanol and CO, respectively. This study underlines the important role of metal-oxide-interface in determining the catalytic behavior of oxide-supported In2O3 catalysts in CO2 conversion.
AB - Herein we present a mechanistic study on the support effect (ZrO2 and CeO2) of In2O3 catalysts in CO2 hydrogenation by a combined experimental and computational approach. Kinetic experiments and surface characterization suggested that the activity of In2O3 catalysts cannot be simply correlated with the abundance of surface oxygen vacancies (Ov) formed by either H2-reduction or thermal treatment, which has been frequently invoked in previous studies. The support effect should originate from the electronic interactions between In2O3 and the support oxide, rather than geometric factors or the difference in the particle size of In2O3. Theoretical modelling revealed that surface Ov facilitate the formation and stabilization of the formate (HCOO*) intermediate. While a carbonate-like structure is favored for CO2 adsorption on CeO2-supported or unsupported In2O3 catalysts, CO2 tends to bind strongly in a bent configuration on the Ov site at the In2O3-ZrO2 interface. The distinct CO2 adsorption structures on different supported In2O3 catalysts may account for the different reaction energy profiles in the subsequent hydrogenation reactions, especially the rate-limiting step, i.e., hydrogenation of HCOO* to CH2O* and methoxy (CH3O*). The relatively higher methanol selectivity of In2O3 catalyst supported on ZrO2 with respect to that on CeO2 is suggested to stem from the greater energy difference (ΔEa) between the parallel hydrogenation and C-O bond cleavage of HCOO*, which leads to the formation of methanol and CO, respectively. This study underlines the important role of metal-oxide-interface in determining the catalytic behavior of oxide-supported In2O3 catalysts in CO2 conversion.
KW - CO hydrogenation
KW - DFT calculations
KW - Indium oxide (InO) catalyst
KW - Methanol synthesis
KW - Support effect
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85113283793
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/af5d1811-4d4c-3712-bf33-b5d1e4f50da4/
U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131767
DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131767
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85113283793
SN - 1385-8947
VL - 426
JO - Chemical engineering journal
JF - Chemical engineering journal
M1 - 131767
ER -