Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Measuring risk importance in a dynamic PRA framework

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Risk importance measures are indexes that are used to rank systems, structures and components (SSCs) using risk-informed methods. The most used/known measures are: Risk Reduction Worth (RRW), Risk Achievement Worth (RAW), Birnbaum (B) and Fussell-Vesely (FV). Once obtained from classical Probabilistic Risk Analysis (PRA) analyses, these risk measures can be effectively employed to optimize component testing and maintenance. In contrast to classical PRA methods, Dynamic PRA methods couple stochastic methods with safety analysis codes to determine risk associate to complex systems such as nuclear plants. Compared to classical PRA methods, they can evaluate with higher resolution the safety impact of timing and sequencing of events on the accident progression. The objective of this paper is to present a series of algorithms that can be used to determine classical risk importance measures (RRW, RAW, B and FV) along with newly developed ones from a Dynamic PRA analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, PSA 2017
PublisherAmerican Nuclear Society
Pages1069-1076
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)9781510851801
StatePublished - 2017
Event2017 International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, PSA 2017 - Pittsburgh, United States
Duration: Sep 24 2017 → Sep 28 2017

Publication series

NameInternational Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, PSA 2017
Volume2

Conference

Conference2017 International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis, PSA 2017
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityPittsburgh
Period09/24/17 → 09/28/17

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring risk importance in a dynamic PRA framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this