TY - GEN
T1 - Information foraging in nuclear power plant control rooms
AU - Boring, R. L.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Information foraging theory articulates the role of the human as an "informavore" that seeks information and follows optimal foraging strategies (i.e., the "information scent") to find meaningful information. This paper briefly reviews the findings from information foraging theory outside the nuclear domain and then discusses the types of information foraging strategies operators employ for normal and off-normal operations in the control room. For example, operators may employ a predatory "wolf" strategy of hunting for information in the face of a plant upset. However, during routine operations, the operators may employ a trapping "spider" strategy of waiting for relevant indicators to appear. This delineation corresponds to information pull and push strategies, respectively. No studies have been conducted to determine explicitly the characteristics of a control room interface that is optimized for both push and pull information foraging strategies, nor has there been empirical work to validate operator performance when transitioning between push and pull strategies. This paper explores examples of control room operators as wolves vs. spiders and concludes by proposing a set of research questions to investigate information foraging in control room settings.
AB - Information foraging theory articulates the role of the human as an "informavore" that seeks information and follows optimal foraging strategies (i.e., the "information scent") to find meaningful information. This paper briefly reviews the findings from information foraging theory outside the nuclear domain and then discusses the types of information foraging strategies operators employ for normal and off-normal operations in the control room. For example, operators may employ a predatory "wolf" strategy of hunting for information in the face of a plant upset. However, during routine operations, the operators may employ a trapping "spider" strategy of waiting for relevant indicators to appear. This delineation corresponds to information pull and push strategies, respectively. No studies have been conducted to determine explicitly the characteristics of a control room interface that is optimized for both push and pull information foraging strategies, nor has there been empirical work to validate operator performance when transitioning between push and pull strategies. This paper explores examples of control room operators as wolves vs. spiders and concludes by proposing a set of research questions to investigate information foraging in control room settings.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84856725396
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84856725396
SN - 9780415683791
T3 - Advances in Safety, Reliability and Risk Management - Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2011
SP - 654
EP - 660
BT - Advances in Safety, Reliability and Risk Management - Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2011
T2 - European Safety and Reliability Conference: Advances in Safety, Reliability and Risk Management, ESREL 2011
Y2 - 18 September 2011 through 22 September 2011
ER -