Improving Experimental Design through Uncertainty Analysis

Ian M. Hobbs, Joey A. Charboneau, Todd L. Jacobsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this paper, the development of a fission-gas collecting and physical-analysis-enabling instrument was proposed for small-volume determination. Analysis specifications require a design capable of accurately and repeatably determining volumes in the range of 0.07–2.5 mL. This system relies on a series of gas expansions originating from a cylinder with known internal volume. The combined gas law is used to derive the unknown volumes from these expansions. Initial system designs included one of two known volumes, 11.85 ± 0.34 mL and 5.807 ± 0.078 mL, with a manifold volume of 32 mL. Results obtained from modeling this system’s operation showed that 0.07 mL can be determined with a relative expanded uncertainty greater than 300% (k = 2) for a single replicate, which was unacceptable for the proposed experimental design. Initial modeling showed that the volume connecting the known volume and rodlet, i.e., the manifold volume, and the sensitivity of the pressure sensor were key contributors to the expanded uncertainty of the measured rodlet volume. The system’s design limited the available options for pressure sensors, so emphasis was placed on the design of the manifold volume. The final system design reduced the manifold volume to 17 mL. These changes in design, combined with replicate analysis, were able to reduce the relative expanded uncertainty by ±12% (k = 2) for the 0.07 mL volume.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)246-253
Number of pages8
JournalMetrology
Volume3
Issue number3
Early online dateJun 28 2023
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 28 2023

Keywords

  • experimental design
  • gas analysis
  • uncertainty evaluation

INL Publication Number

  • INL/JOU-22-69852
  • 142068

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving Experimental Design through Uncertainty Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this