Abstract
In this paper, we present the application of two linear machine learning techniques; ridge
regression and kernel regression for the estimation of illumination chromaticity. A number
of machine learning techniques, neural networks and support vector machines in particular, are used to estimate the illumination chromaticity. These nonlinear approaches are
shown to outperform many traditional algorithms. However, neither neural networks nor
support vector machines were compared to linear regression tools in the past. We evaluate
the performance of linear machine learning techniques and draw comparison with nonlinear machine learning techniques. Kernel regression achieves a mean root mean square
chromaticity error of 0.052 while neural network results in 0.071. An improvement of 26%
is achieved. Both quantitative and qualitative results show that the performances of the
linear techniques are better when compared to nonlinear techniques on the same data set.
Machine learning approaches are also compared with the gray-world and the scale by max
algorithms. We perform uncertainty analysis of machine learning algorithms using a bootstrapped training data set to evaluate their consistency in the estimation of illumination
chromaticity. Applications like video tracking and target detection, where illumination
chromaticity estimation is important will be benefited by a better performance of linear
machine learning algorithms.
regression and kernel regression for the estimation of illumination chromaticity. A number
of machine learning techniques, neural networks and support vector machines in particular, are used to estimate the illumination chromaticity. These nonlinear approaches are
shown to outperform many traditional algorithms. However, neither neural networks nor
support vector machines were compared to linear regression tools in the past. We evaluate
the performance of linear machine learning techniques and draw comparison with nonlinear machine learning techniques. Kernel regression achieves a mean root mean square
chromaticity error of 0.052 while neural network results in 0.071. An improvement of 26%
is achieved. Both quantitative and qualitative results show that the performances of the
linear techniques are better when compared to nonlinear techniques on the same data set.
Machine learning approaches are also compared with the gray-world and the scale by max
algorithms. We perform uncertainty analysis of machine learning algorithms using a bootstrapped training data set to evaluate their consistency in the estimation of illumination
chromaticity. Applications like video tracking and target detection, where illumination
chromaticity estimation is important will be benefited by a better performance of linear
machine learning algorithms.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Pattern Recognition Research |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | Aug 2008 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2008 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- support vector machines
- color constancy
- Illumination chromaticity
- ridge regression
- nonparametric kernel regression
- neural networks
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Illumination Chromaticity Estimation Using Linear Learning Methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver