Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Human reliability analysis in the U.S. nuclear power industry: A comparison of atomistic and holistic methods

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

A variety of methods have been developed to generate human error probabilities for use in the US nuclear power industry. When actual operations data are not available, it is necessary for an analyst to estimate these probabilities. Most approaches, including THERP, ASEP, SLIM-MAUD, and SPAR-H, feature an atomistic approach to characterizing and estimating error. The atomistic approach is based on the notion that events and their causes can be decomposed and individually quantified. In contrast, in the holistic approach, such as found in ATHEANA, the analysis centers on the entire event, which is typically quantified as an indivisible whole. The distinction between atomistic and holistic approaches is important in understanding the nature of human reliability analysis quantification and the utility and shortcomings associated with each approach.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, HFES 2005
PublisherHuman Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc.
Pages1815-1819
Number of pages5
ISBN (Print)094528926X, 9780945289265
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
Event49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2005 - Orlando, FL, United States
Duration: Sep 26 2005Sep 30 2005

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
ISSN (Print)1071-1813

Conference

Conference49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES 2005
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityOrlando, FL
Period09/26/0509/30/05

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Human reliability analysis in the U.S. nuclear power industry: A comparison of atomistic and holistic methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this