TY - GEN
T1 - Experimental Testing of Mechanical Splices for Titanium Alloy Bars
AU - Acharya, Mahesh
AU - Mashal, Mustafa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 IABSE Symposium Prague, 2022: Challenges for Existing and Oncoming Structures - Report. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Recently application of Titanium Alloy Bars (TiABs) has been gaining popularity in retrofitting of bridges in the United States using near-surface mounted techniques. TiABs offer high strength, excellent corrosion resistance, enhanced fatigue performance, lighter weight, lower stiffness, and less residual deformation beyond the yield point. Currently, there is a lack of a splicing system for TiABs. There are various mechanical splicing systems available for conventional and high-strength steels; however, they have not been investigated for splicing of TiABs. The research investigates some of the existing splicing systems for pseudo-threaded TiABs. Mechanical splices from a producer in the United States are considered for this research. Three different types of mechanical couplers are investigated for splicing of #5 (ø16mm) and #6 (ø19mm) pseudo-threaded TiABs. TiABs larger than #6 are more expensive and harder to bend, therefore #5 and #6 TiABs are more popular and have been implemented in several bridges in the United States. Tensile testing is carried out on several #5 and #6 spliced TiABs in accordance with relevant ASTM Standards to investigate suitability of each splicing system. Observations from testing showed that only one type of splicing system was able to achieve failure of TiABs at a location away from the spliced region. The other two splicing systems had premature pullout or failure of the coupler itself. Testing results suggest that the successful coupler/splicing system was in close compliance with the requirements of AASHTO LRFD that require mechanical splices to achieve more than 125% of the yield strength of the bar. Given the lower strain hardening of TiABs (1.1) compared to conventional steel (1.5), the coupler system identified in this research is concluded to be adequate for mechanical splicing of #5 and #6 TiABs subjected to monotonic tensile stresses.
AB - Recently application of Titanium Alloy Bars (TiABs) has been gaining popularity in retrofitting of bridges in the United States using near-surface mounted techniques. TiABs offer high strength, excellent corrosion resistance, enhanced fatigue performance, lighter weight, lower stiffness, and less residual deformation beyond the yield point. Currently, there is a lack of a splicing system for TiABs. There are various mechanical splicing systems available for conventional and high-strength steels; however, they have not been investigated for splicing of TiABs. The research investigates some of the existing splicing systems for pseudo-threaded TiABs. Mechanical splices from a producer in the United States are considered for this research. Three different types of mechanical couplers are investigated for splicing of #5 (ø16mm) and #6 (ø19mm) pseudo-threaded TiABs. TiABs larger than #6 are more expensive and harder to bend, therefore #5 and #6 TiABs are more popular and have been implemented in several bridges in the United States. Tensile testing is carried out on several #5 and #6 spliced TiABs in accordance with relevant ASTM Standards to investigate suitability of each splicing system. Observations from testing showed that only one type of splicing system was able to achieve failure of TiABs at a location away from the spliced region. The other two splicing systems had premature pullout or failure of the coupler itself. Testing results suggest that the successful coupler/splicing system was in close compliance with the requirements of AASHTO LRFD that require mechanical splices to achieve more than 125% of the yield strength of the bar. Given the lower strain hardening of TiABs (1.1) compared to conventional steel (1.5), the coupler system identified in this research is concluded to be adequate for mechanical splicing of #5 and #6 TiABs subjected to monotonic tensile stresses.
KW - innovative materials
KW - mechanical couplers
KW - splicing
KW - tensile test
KW - Titanium alloy bars
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85133515832
U2 - 10.2749/prague.2022.0266
DO - 10.2749/prague.2022.0266
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85133515832
T3 - IABSE Symposium Prague, 2022: Challenges for Existing and Oncoming Structures - Report
SP - 266
EP - 271
BT - IABSE Symposium Prague, 2022
PB - International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)
T2 - IABSE Symposium Prague 2022: Challenges for Existing and Oncoming Structures
Y2 - 25 May 2022 through 27 May 2022
ER -