TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimation of the time for steam generator trip due to cyber intrusions
AU - Patel, Japan K.
AU - Varuttamaseni, Athi
AU - Youngblood, Robert W.
AU - Lee, John C.
AU - Wacker, Steven
AU - Pires Barbosa, Rafael
AU - Guo, Junjie
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the U.S. DOE Nuclear Energy University Program (NEUP) Grant DE-NE0008783, 18-15056. The authors would like to thank Drs. Stephen G. Hancock and Linyu Lin of the Idaho National Laboratory for their review and comments on the paper. We would also like to thank Balaji Kannan and Juan Castaneda from GSES for introducing us to various functionalities of the GPWR Simulator.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - The time required to trip a pressurized water reactor (PWR) by inserting malicious signals into its steam generator (SG) control system has been studied using the Generic PWR (GPWR) Simulator. A semi-analytical model is developed to approximately reproduce the simulator response and understand the dynamics of the control unit. A series of two proportional-integral controllers determines control action according to preset constants, the readings from the feedwater level sensor, and those from feedwater and steam flowrate transmitters. It is observed that the most important factor that determines whether a trip will occur is how much additional water is added to or withheld from the SG over time compared to normal operating conditions. In order to determine the effects of control action on the SG, changes in mass inventory are considered. This approach models the SG water level as a function of mass inventory and has a backward temporal memory. A Python interface is developed for the GPWR framework to automatically simulate different spoofing scenarios and post-process the related data. We observe that the trip times predominantly depend on flow mismatch and/or level errors. Controller parameters, including the integral time and gain constants, either speed up or slow down the rate of progression to a trip setpoint but do not cause a trip by themselves. The reactor can trip on a high-level signal when the reading crosses above 78%, increased from its reference level of 57%, or a low-level reading when it is below 25%. The present results show roughly how long the operators would have to respond to an attack, given a specific set of spoofing signals within the issue space analyzed. We have generated a simple surface by fitting a combination of exponential functions to the data obtained from the GPWR Simulator. In general, trips on a low level have been observed to occur faster than those on a high level.
AB - The time required to trip a pressurized water reactor (PWR) by inserting malicious signals into its steam generator (SG) control system has been studied using the Generic PWR (GPWR) Simulator. A semi-analytical model is developed to approximately reproduce the simulator response and understand the dynamics of the control unit. A series of two proportional-integral controllers determines control action according to preset constants, the readings from the feedwater level sensor, and those from feedwater and steam flowrate transmitters. It is observed that the most important factor that determines whether a trip will occur is how much additional water is added to or withheld from the SG over time compared to normal operating conditions. In order to determine the effects of control action on the SG, changes in mass inventory are considered. This approach models the SG water level as a function of mass inventory and has a backward temporal memory. A Python interface is developed for the GPWR framework to automatically simulate different spoofing scenarios and post-process the related data. We observe that the trip times predominantly depend on flow mismatch and/or level errors. Controller parameters, including the integral time and gain constants, either speed up or slow down the rate of progression to a trip setpoint but do not cause a trip by themselves. The reactor can trip on a high-level signal when the reading crosses above 78%, increased from its reference level of 57%, or a low-level reading when it is below 25%. The present results show roughly how long the operators would have to respond to an attack, given a specific set of spoofing signals within the issue space analyzed. We have generated a simple surface by fitting a combination of exponential functions to the data obtained from the GPWR Simulator. In general, trips on a low level have been observed to occur faster than those on a high level.
KW - Cyber-security
KW - Power plant simulator
KW - Reactor trip
KW - Steam generator
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85127349612
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/989ccb62-e355-3874-a4c5-24e376b418b7/
U2 - 10.1016/j.anucene.2022.109108
DO - 10.1016/j.anucene.2022.109108
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85127349612
SN - 0306-4549
VL - 173
JO - Annals of Nuclear Energy
JF - Annals of Nuclear Energy
M1 - 109108
ER -