TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and assessment of a model predictive controller enabling anticipatory control strategies for a heat-pipe system
AU - Lin, Linyu
AU - Oncken, Joseph
AU - Agarwal, Vivek
AU - Permann, Cody
AU - Gribok, Andrei
AU - McJunkin, Timothy
AU - Eggers, Shannon
AU - Boring, Ronald
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is supported through the INL Laboratory Directed Research & Development Program under Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office contract no. DE-AC07-05ID14517 . This research makes use of the resources of the High Performance Computing Center at Idaho National Laboratory , which is supported by the Office of Nuclear Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy and the Nuclear Science User Facilities under Contract No. DE-AC07-05ID14517 . The authors would like to acknowledge technical supports from Joshus Hansel at Idaho National Laboratory in implementing and running the heat pipe simulations. The authors would like to acknowledge John M. Shaver for technical editing, Mohammad Abdo and Jacob Farber for their comments and suggestions.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/2/1
Y1 - 2023/2/1
N2 - To support the reliable and resilient operation of modular reactors and microreactors, anticipatory control strategies have been proposed for achieving faster-than-real-time predictions and decision-making capabilities in anticipation of potential anomalies, including setpoint changes and cyber incidents. This work presents how anticipatory control strategies can be implemented via model predictive control (MPC) for a single heat pipe's temperature. Considering the uncertainty in developing and applying MPC, this work evaluates MPC performance given three different model forms: a linear response surface model, an artificial neural network (ANN), and an autoregressive model with exogenous input (ARX). This work also evaluates the impacts of different input biases and variance on MPC performance in order to account for potential sensor reading variations due to cyber incidents. We observe that the ANN and ARX result in more fluctuated control actions compared to the MPC with linear response surface model. However, when the cyber incidents are of large magnitudes, the linear response surface model produces smaller feasible regions than the ANN and ARX models under identical constraints.
AB - To support the reliable and resilient operation of modular reactors and microreactors, anticipatory control strategies have been proposed for achieving faster-than-real-time predictions and decision-making capabilities in anticipation of potential anomalies, including setpoint changes and cyber incidents. This work presents how anticipatory control strategies can be implemented via model predictive control (MPC) for a single heat pipe's temperature. Considering the uncertainty in developing and applying MPC, this work evaluates MPC performance given three different model forms: a linear response surface model, an artificial neural network (ANN), and an autoregressive model with exogenous input (ARX). This work also evaluates the impacts of different input biases and variance on MPC performance in order to account for potential sensor reading variations due to cyber incidents. We observe that the ANN and ARX result in more fluctuated control actions compared to the MPC with linear response surface model. However, when the cyber incidents are of large magnitudes, the linear response surface model produces smaller feasible regions than the ANN and ARX models under identical constraints.
KW - Anticipatory control
KW - Fission battery
KW - Heat pipe
KW - Model predictive control
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85145264341
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/176636f4-0f23-3f07-a7b5-b19b0c06b621/
U2 - 10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104527
DO - 10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104527
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85145264341
SN - 0149-1970
VL - 156
JO - Progress in Nuclear Energy
JF - Progress in Nuclear Energy
M1 - 104527
ER -