Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Corrosion and strength degradation behaviors of binderless WC material and WC–Co hardmetal in alkaline solution: A comparative investigation

  • Wei Tang
  • , Li Zhang
  • , Yi Chen
  • , Huadong Zhang
  • , Lei Zhou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Scopus citations

Abstract

Unsatisfactory corrosion resistance is the main weakness of WC–Co hardmetals and hence, binderless WC materials (bWCs) are considered as the promising alternatives in such tough service conditions. Nevertheless, the knowledge of the quantitative difference in the corrosion resistance and corrosion-induced strength degradation of the two materials are limited. Well-densified straight bWC and WC–10Co hardmetal were fabricated by spark plasma sintering and sinter-HIP, respectively. Corrosion investigations conducted by weight loss, solution analysis and assisted by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, as well as X-ray diffractometer consistently indicate that bWC exhibits excellent corrosion resistance in 1 M NaOH solution. The average corrosion rate (0.045 mm/y) of WC–10Co evaluated by weight loss in the duration of 28 days is approximately 6.4 times that of bWC. Substantial strength degradation and narrowing in the strength gap between the two materials, i.e., from 4.4 times in their original state to 2 times after being continuously immersed for 28 days are observed. The related corrosion behaviors are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials
Volume68
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Binderless WC material
  • Cemented carbide
  • Corrosion rate
  • Immersion
  • Strength degradation
  • Synergistic corrosion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrosion and strength degradation behaviors of binderless WC material and WC–Co hardmetal in alkaline solution: A comparative investigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this