TY - GEN
T1 - Comparison of Event-Triggered Model Predictive Control for Autonomous Vehicle Path Tracking
AU - Chen, Jun
AU - Yi, Zonggen
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 IEEE.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - This paper proposes two different event-triggered nonlinear model predictive controls (NMPC) for autonomous vehicle path tracking. The difference between the two event-triggered NMPCs is the determination of control action when an event is not triggered. In the first formulation, the optimal control sequence computed from last triggering event is shifted to determine control action when NMPC is not triggered, while in the second formulation, a time-triggered linear parametric varying MPC (LPV-MPC) with shorter prediction horizon is formulated and solved in between NMPC triggering events to compensate prediction error and disturbance. These two event-triggered NMPCs, together with a time-triggered LPVMPC and a time-triggered NMPC serving as benchmark, are implemented to track the vehicle path in both longitudinal and lateral directions, with axle driving torque and front steering input as the control variables. Control performance and throughput requirements of different MPCs are then measured and compared, where the advantage of event-triggered formulation is clearly demonstrated.
AB - This paper proposes two different event-triggered nonlinear model predictive controls (NMPC) for autonomous vehicle path tracking. The difference between the two event-triggered NMPCs is the determination of control action when an event is not triggered. In the first formulation, the optimal control sequence computed from last triggering event is shifted to determine control action when NMPC is not triggered, while in the second formulation, a time-triggered linear parametric varying MPC (LPV-MPC) with shorter prediction horizon is formulated and solved in between NMPC triggering events to compensate prediction error and disturbance. These two event-triggered NMPCs, together with a time-triggered LPVMPC and a time-triggered NMPC serving as benchmark, are implemented to track the vehicle path in both longitudinal and lateral directions, with axle driving torque and front steering input as the control variables. Control performance and throughput requirements of different MPCs are then measured and compared, where the advantage of event-triggered formulation is clearly demonstrated.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124805834&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/CCTA48906.2021.9659192
DO - 10.1109/CCTA48906.2021.9659192
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85124805834
T3 - CCTA 2021 - 5th IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications
SP - 808
EP - 813
BT - CCTA 2021 - 5th IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 5th IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications, CCTA 2021
Y2 - 8 August 2021 through 11 August 2021
ER -