Abstract
In this letter, some widespread misuses pertaining to kinetic analysis carried out using experimental data from a single non-isothermal curve are clarified in response to a manuscript recently published in this journal (Huang et al., 2003). It is shown that kinetic parameters cannot be unambiguously determined from data extracted from a single non-isothermal curve because different kinetic triplets can describe the very same curve. Thus, a set of curves recorded under different heating schedules are to be employed in order to obtain reliable kinetic parameters. Also, it is proven that assuming first order kinetic models constitutes an oversimplification that can easily lead to erroneous kinetic parameters.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 132-135 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Applied Energy |
| Volume | 125 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 15 2014 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Activation energy
- Kinetic models
- Kinetics
- Pyrolysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comments on "Pyrolysis kinetics of biomass from product information" (Applied Energy 110 (2013) 1-8) regarding the inability to obtain meaningful kinetic parameters from a single non-isothermal curve'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver