Assessment of Grizzly Capabilities for Reactor Pressure Vessels and Reinforced Concrete Structures

Over the last several years, capabilities to simulate the progression and effects of degradation in critical structures in light water reactor (LWR) nuclear power plants have been under development in the Grizzly code. Age-related material degradation is important for a number of systems in LWRs, but the main focus for Grizzly development has been on reactor pressure vessels (RPVs) and concrete structures because of their central role and the difficulty of replacement of these structures if they are found to be degraded to an unacceptable degree. The capabilities for analyzing both RPVs and concrete structures in Grizzly have reached a point where the feature sets are sufficiently complete to perform credible analyses of those types of structures. Because of this, the emphasis has shifted from foundational development to assessing the accuracy of these modeling capabilities on representative problems of interest and on improving the physical basis of those models to improve their ability to predict the actual response of those structural systems. This report documents a first set of test cases that have been developed to assess the Grizzly code on real-world problems for these two types of structures. For RPVs, these test cases consist of a set of benchmark problems where Grizzly is compared to another code. For concrete structures, a set of models of experimental specimens designed to characterize the multidimensional swelling response of reinforced concrete members due to alkali-silica reaction (ASR) has been developed and compared with experimental results. Both the RPV and concrete test cases developed here are much more computationally intensive than the small regression tests that are used in the testing that Grizzly undergoes every time a proposed set of changes is made to ensure that those changes do not adversely affect previously established behavior. A system for regularly running these large problems to monitor the behavior of the code as it is developed has been instituted. While these test cases generally indicate good comparison with the benchmark results, they also indicate areas where further development is warranted.