TY - JOUR
T1 - Active learning with multifidelity modeling for efficient rare event simulation
AU - Dhulipala, Somayajulu L.N.
AU - Shields, Michael D.
AU - Spencer, Benjamin W.
AU - Bolisetti, Chandrakanth
AU - Slaughter, Andrew E.
AU - Labouré, Vincent M.
AU - Chakroborty, Promit
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is supported through the INL Laboratory Directed Research & Development ( LDRD ) Program under DOE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517 . This research made use of the resources of the High Performance Computing Center at INL, which is supported by the Office of Nuclear Energy of the U.S. DOE and the Nuclear Science User Facilities under Contract No. DE-AC07-05ID14517 . Two anonymous reviewers are thanked for their valuable comments which have improved the quality of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - While multifidelity modeling provides a cost-effective way to conduct uncertainty quantification with computationally expensive models, much greater efficiency can be achieved by adaptively deciding the number of required high-fidelity (HF) simulations, depending on the type and complexity of the problem and the desired accuracy in the results. We propose a framework for active learning with multifidelity modeling emphasizing the efficient estimation of rare events. Our framework works by fusing a low-fidelity (LF) prediction with an HF-inferred correction, filtering the corrected LF prediction to decide whether to call the high-fidelity model, and for enhanced subsequent accuracy, adapting the correction for the LF prediction after every HF model call. The framework does not make any assumptions as to the LF model type or its correlations with the HF model. In addition, for improved robustness when estimating smaller failure probabilities, we propose using dynamic active learning functions that decide when to call the HF model. We demonstrate our framework using several academic case studies (including some high-dimensional problems) and two finite element model case studies: estimating Navier-Stokes velocities using the Stokes approximation and estimating stresses in a transversely isotropic model subjected to displacements via a coarsely meshed isotropic model. Across these case studies, not only did the proposed framework estimate the failure probabilities accurately, but compared with either Monte Carlo or a standard variance reduction method, it also required only a small fraction of the calls to the HF model.
AB - While multifidelity modeling provides a cost-effective way to conduct uncertainty quantification with computationally expensive models, much greater efficiency can be achieved by adaptively deciding the number of required high-fidelity (HF) simulations, depending on the type and complexity of the problem and the desired accuracy in the results. We propose a framework for active learning with multifidelity modeling emphasizing the efficient estimation of rare events. Our framework works by fusing a low-fidelity (LF) prediction with an HF-inferred correction, filtering the corrected LF prediction to decide whether to call the high-fidelity model, and for enhanced subsequent accuracy, adapting the correction for the LF prediction after every HF model call. The framework does not make any assumptions as to the LF model type or its correlations with the HF model. In addition, for improved robustness when estimating smaller failure probabilities, we propose using dynamic active learning functions that decide when to call the HF model. We demonstrate our framework using several academic case studies (including some high-dimensional problems) and two finite element model case studies: estimating Navier-Stokes velocities using the Stokes approximation and estimating stresses in a transversely isotropic model subjected to displacements via a coarsely meshed isotropic model. Across these case studies, not only did the proposed framework estimate the failure probabilities accurately, but compared with either Monte Carlo or a standard variance reduction method, it also required only a small fraction of the calls to the HF model.
KW - Active learning
KW - Monte Carlo
KW - Multifidelity modeling
KW - Reliability
KW - Uncertainty quantification
KW - Variance reduction
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85135714645
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111506
DO - 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111506
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85135714645
SN - 0021-9991
VL - 468
SP - 111506
JO - Journal of Computational Physics
JF - Journal of Computational Physics
M1 - 111506
ER -