TY - JOUR
T1 - A phase-field model for void and gas bubble superlattice formation in irradiated solids
AU - Aagesen, Larry K.
AU - Jokisaari, Andrea
AU - Schwen, Daniel
AU - Jiang, Chao
AU - Schneider, Anton
AU - Zhang, Yongfeng
AU - Sun, Cheng
AU - Gan, Jian
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was fully sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science , Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Materials Sciences and Engineering Division under FWP #C000-14-003 at Idaho National Laboratory, operated by Battelle Energy Alliance (BEA) under DOE-NE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517. This research made use of the resources of the High Performance Computing Center at Idaho National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Nuclear Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy and the Nuclear Science User Facilities under Contract No. DE-AC07-05ID14517 . The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes.
Funding Information:
This work was fully sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Materials Sciences and Engineering Division under FWP #C000-14-003 at Idaho National Laboratory, operated by Battelle Energy Alliance (BEA) under DOE-NE Idaho Operations Office Contract DE-AC07-05ID14517. This research made use of the resources of the High Performance Computing Center at Idaho National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Nuclear Energy of the U.S. Department of Energy and the Nuclear Science User Facilities under Contract No. DE-AC07-05ID14517. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - A phase-field model to simulate the formation of both void and gas bubble superlattices is derived from a grand potential functional, assuming 1D diffusion of self-interstitial atoms. The model is capable of accounting for superlattice formation by either a nucleation and growth or spinodal decomposition mechanism; in this work, we focus on the nucleation and growth mechanism, using a discrete nucleation approach in the phase-field model. In simulations of void formation, short aligned rows of voids were initially formed, followed by growth in the size of the aligned rows, and finally leading to superlattice formation, consistent with experimental observations. Void superlattice spacing as a function of model parameters was quantified. Increased nucleation rates led to smaller superlattice spacing, while increased vacancy diffusivity led to larger superlattice spacing. In simulations of gas bubble superlattice formation, superlattice spacing decreased with increasing gas atom flux, consistent with experimental observations. Simulations with increasing ratio of gas atom flux to vacancy–interstitial pair production led to increased superlattice spacing, which is inconsistent with experimental observations at high gas atom flux rates; this discrepancy is attributed to the fact that the model does not account for bound gas atom–vacancy pairs that may dominate at high gas flux rates.
AB - A phase-field model to simulate the formation of both void and gas bubble superlattices is derived from a grand potential functional, assuming 1D diffusion of self-interstitial atoms. The model is capable of accounting for superlattice formation by either a nucleation and growth or spinodal decomposition mechanism; in this work, we focus on the nucleation and growth mechanism, using a discrete nucleation approach in the phase-field model. In simulations of void formation, short aligned rows of voids were initially formed, followed by growth in the size of the aligned rows, and finally leading to superlattice formation, consistent with experimental observations. Void superlattice spacing as a function of model parameters was quantified. Increased nucleation rates led to smaller superlattice spacing, while increased vacancy diffusivity led to larger superlattice spacing. In simulations of gas bubble superlattice formation, superlattice spacing decreased with increasing gas atom flux, consistent with experimental observations. Simulations with increasing ratio of gas atom flux to vacancy–interstitial pair production led to increased superlattice spacing, which is inconsistent with experimental observations at high gas atom flux rates; this discrepancy is attributed to the fact that the model does not account for bound gas atom–vacancy pairs that may dominate at high gas flux rates.
KW - Gas bubble
KW - Nucleation
KW - Phase-field
KW - Radiation
KW - Superlattice
KW - Void
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137693130&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/a8c7cd7e-4909-371d-8068-3d92623568d1/
U2 - 10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111772
DO - 10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111772
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85137693130
SN - 0927-0256
VL - 215
JO - Computational Materials Science
JF - Computational Materials Science
M1 - 111772
ER -